Earmarks are a favorite topic in Washington these days — among members of Congress who want the practice banned, and reporters who follow the money that lawmakers send back to their districts. 

Even as Sen. Daniel Inouye extended a moratorium on earmarking last week, he defended the practice. Inouye has long been known for his ability to direct significant federal funds to Hawaii, which has made him popular among many in the Islands and subject to criticism from those who’d like the money spent elsewhere (or not at all). 

In an interview with DC808 on Monday evening, Inouye reiterated his belief that eliminating earmarks encourages a system of behind-the-scenes deal-making that keeps the public in the dark.

“If you’re Mr. Government, executive office, and you have control over a little bag of money, then you can tell me, ‘Well, we can help you on Project A, but we need your support on Project X,’” Inouye said. “That’s a hell of a way to do business. If Project A is no good, it’s no good.”

Inouye also argued that earmarks make sense because federal lawmakers are best positioned to understand their districts’ unique needs.

“I know a bit more about Hawaii than some very energetic, smart graduate of Yale who has never been to Hawaii, and can hardly pronounce ‘Kamehameha,’” Inouye said. “And he’s going to decide how to spend the money for Hawaii?”