The plaintiffs wanted this information in the record because they considered it relevant to combat assertions by the defense (mainly the city and county of Honolulu) that the public favors the $5.26 billion rail project.
I guess the idea would be that Cayetano capturing more than 40 percent of the vote in a three-way race is the same as a referendum on the project.
Tashima didn’t buy it and decided to rule against the plaintiff’s request saying, “who wins the election is not to be a determinant of what happens in court.”
He said the only issue is whether the city and the Federal Transit Administration followed the law when choosing to move ahead with the heavy rail project.
—Nick Grube
GET IN-DEPTH
REPORTING ON HAWAII’S BIGGEST ISSUES
What it means to support Civil Beat.
Supporting Civil Beat means you’re investing in a newsroom that can devote months to investigate corruption. It means we can cover vulnerable, overlooked communities because those stories matter. And, it means we serve you. And only you.
Donate today and help sustain the kind of journalism Hawaiʻi cannot afford to lose.