Budgets are moral documents. Of course, there are other ways to determine what we as a society value, but in a world where basic needs cost money, budgets represent what we prioritize in life. Budgets are an expression of societal values. As the state of Hawaii considers how to reconcile its budget with the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, we need to remember this.

The major hit to the state of Hawaii’s budget ripples out to public institutions that are vital to our lives. Gov. David Ige’s proposal to furlough government employees equal to 10% of salaries is especially concerning for how it will impact education. Even the suggestion of furloughs is unethical.

Hawaii Scholars for Education and Social Justice has presented how funding shortages in public education result in student inequities that negatively impact Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, and Filipino students at disproportionate rates. The already low pay of teachers (the lowest in the nation when adjusted for cost-of-living) hinders our ability to recruit and retain a high quality teacher workforce.

Public school teachers often take on second jobs to make ends meet. These conditions ultimately impact the quality of instruction students receive as well as student achievement.

Just months before the pandemic hit, the Hawaii Department of Education took bold action to provide substantial pay differentials to teachers working in the highest areas of need in our state. This included teachers in special education, Hawaiian immersion, and teachers working in the most hard-to-fill schools.

In less than one year, the influences of such a daring strategy can already be seen; recruitment into state teacher preparation programs increased, retention rates among high need fields and hard-to-staff schools grew, and the state now has the lowest percentage of vacancies in special education in its history.

However, the Hawaii DOE proposed this funding initiative on its own, hoping the state would recognize its value and follow with necessary funding. After decades of unsuccessfully battling teacher shortages, especially in areas working with youth and families who are often marginalized, can we truly afford (literally and figuratively) to lose funding and salaries in K-12 public education?

Drastic Impacts

Budget shortfalls are also drastically impacting higher education. The University of Hawaii System is making cuts across all campuses. The most publicly available and largest proposed cuts are at the state’s flagship campus, University of Hawaii Manoa, where a budget committee has recommended cutting or streamlining a number of academic departments and programs. While this is an iterative process and is not over yet, the initial suggestions by the administration are both telling and concerning.

After reviewing enrollment numbers, ratios of students to employees, the amount of degree programs that each department offers, and a few other data points, the budget committee submitted their preliminary suggestions for addressing the looming budget cuts. In September, proposals included the recommendation that American Studies, Asian Studies, Ethnic Studies, Pacific Island Studies, and Women Studies “partner” with Interdisciplinary Studies to boost enrollment in their courses.

While partnering sounds benign and even helpful, the subtle prescription was that eventually all of these departments would be merged into the overarching unit of Interdisciplinary Studies. Other propositions were terminating the bachelor’s degree in Philippine Language and Culture, and ending the Ph.D. in Social Welfare.

What is clear from UH Manoa’s Planning for a Present and Post-Pandemic Hawaii website is that there is no consideration of how vital each of these departments are in this moment — and always. The students who enroll in these departments are the same students who historically have been underserved in our K-12 public schools.

Additionally, UH’s planning ignores the importance of these departments as systemic racism and sexism plague the national and local context. Not only has there been heightened attention on racial injustice in policing but during the pandemic we also have seen increased cases of domestic violence and housing precarity.

These departments not only examine and teach about these important issues but also offer creative ways to address them. For instance, Ethnic Studies has connected with ‘Āina Aloha Economic Futures which has been incubating community-based economic recovery plans that offer promising alternatives rather than dismiss how violence is perpetuated by current economic systems.

Coincidental or not, it is important to examine the parallel and timing of UH Manoa’s specific suggestions to President Donald Trump’s executive order attacking Critical Race Theory, anti-bias training, and history curricula that examines the United States’ legacies of racism, white supremacy, and misogyny. UH leadership’s recommendations could be perceived as supporting the executive order.

Budgets are an expression of societal values.

Luckily, after UH faculty pushed back and noted the incredible significance of these academic fields, most of the above recommendations have been removed or tempered. UH’s decisions should be applauded in this regard.

However, a number of troubling proposals remain in UH’s recommended reorganization, including eliminating the bachelor degrees in Religion and Dance (only offering minors), cutting the Ph.D. program in Theater, placing the Center for Public Policy under the University of Hawaii Economic Research Organization, and multiple cuts within the College of Education regarding programs that do not directly support teacher licensure.

The preparation of teacher candidates is extremely important, but also crucial is the support of school administrators, support staff, and the broader study of education, what it means, its history, how it happens, and the varying contexts in which it happens.

Despite ongoing conversations about these proposals, making decisions about academic offerings based on tuition that accompanies student enrollment in courses and majors is not an appropriate way for public educational institutions to operate. A business model that equates incoming dollars with educational and societal worth is not only morally corrupt but also assumes that higher education should only correspond to the labor market.

When we subscribe to that model, we neglect our obligation to the state’s residents and forestall the possibility of envisioning a Hawaii that is more equitable and sustainable for our overall well-being.

In solidarity with the November 19th Day of Action collective, we need to call on our leaders, colleagues, and partners to affirm the central place that anti-racist policies, practices, and curricula have in our institutions of public education. We need to call for an increased commitment to and investment in resources to build the capacity of our educational institutions to address racism — as it intersects with colonialism, anti-Blackness, white supremacy, sexism, and other forms of oppression — through personnel, curricula, professional development, programming, and policy interventions.

This is a moment when the target of attack is not merely anti-racist education, but the much broader work of educating for a democracy that fosters collective understanding, appreciation, and acceptance. Our public schools and university system can and must do more to intervene, including resisting what on the surface level appear to be quick and easy financial savings. The moral consequences of these proposed budget cuts for our society are much too great.

All Hawaii residents, including legislators, need to re-envision the state budget so that it aligns with our values. This means prioritizing public education. It also means ending the tax breaks given to luxury developers, cutting the exorbitant amount of money spent on policing, examining the rainy day and special funds that can be used for general fund expenses, and finding ways to distribute CARES Act money in a timely fashion so that we don’t lose the opportunity to subsidize what truly matters.

Without connecting our budgets to our values, we remain complicit in legacies of oppression.